Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Military Medical Sciences ; (12): 838-841, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-484640

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the demographic characteristics,composition characteristics as well as influencing factors of the cost of hospitalization of patients with lung cancer in Gansu Province in order to help reduce their expenses. Methods The basics,healthcare records and expenses of patients diagnosed with lung cancer in a third-level grade-A hospital in Lanzhou were extracted between 2010 and 2014 through the hospital information system(HIS)database.The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to analyze the difference of expense composition over the past five years and the difference between subgroups.The forward,backward and stepwise selection method was used to select variables and the multi-linear regression analysis was adopted to explore the influencing factors of the cost of hospitalization.Results A total of 2778 eligible lung cancer patients were collected.The statistical analysis showed that western medicine cost (36.39%)and treatment cost (22.46%)accounted for the most of the total expense.The length of hospital stay was the No.1 influencing factor of the cost of hospitalization,followed by the acceptance of surgery,the year of admission and charge type. Conclusion Regulating drug use,enhancing treatment regimens,giving psychological guidance,strengthening hospital management and improving medical resources allocation may be effective measures to reduce the cost of hospitalization and lighten the economic burden for lung cancer patients in Gansu Province.

2.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 1371-4, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-450092

ABSTRACT

Multifactor designs that are able to examine the interactions include factorial design, factorial design with a block factor, repeated measurement design; orthogonal design, split-block design, etc. Among all the above design types that are able to examine the interactions, the factorial design is the most commonly used. It is also called the full-factor experimental design, which means that the levels of all the experimental factors involved in the research are completely combined, and k independent repeated experiments are conducted under each experimental condition. The factorial design with a block factor can also examine the influence of a block factor formed by one or more important non experimental factors based on the factorial design. This article introduces the factorial design and the factorial design with a block factor by examples.

3.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 1229-32, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-450077

ABSTRACT

Three-factor designs that are unable to examine the interactions include crossover design and Latin square design, which can examine three factors: an experimental factor and two block factors. Although the two design types are not quite frequently used in practical research, an unexpected research effect will be achieved if they are correctly adopted on appropriate occasions. This article introduced the 3×3 crossover design and the Latin square design by examples.

4.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 1088-91, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-450060

ABSTRACT

Three-factor designs that are unable to examine the interactions include crossover design and Latin square design, which can examine three factors, namely, an experimental factor and two block factors. Although the two design types are not quite frequently used in practical research, an unexpected research effect will be achieved if they are correctly adopted on appropriate occasions. Due to the limit of space, this article introduces two forms of crossover design.

5.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 298-302, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-449079

ABSTRACT

The design of one factor with k levels (k≥3) refers to the research that only involves one experimental factor with k levels (k≥3), and there is no arrangement for other important non-experimental factors. This paper introduces the estimation of sample size and testing power for quantitative data and qualitative data having a binary response variable with the design of one factor with k levels (k≥3).

6.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 154-9, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-448921

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Estimation of sample size and testing power is an important component of research design. This article introduced methods for sample size and testing power estimation of difference test for quantitative and qualitative data with the single-group design, the paired design or the crossover design. To be specific, this article introduced formulas for sample size and testing power estimation of difference test for quantitative and qualitative data with the above three designs, the realization based on the formulas and the POWER procedure of SAS software and elaborated it with examples, which will benefit researchers for implementing the repetition principle.

7.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 35-8, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-448906

ABSTRACT

Sample size estimation is necessary for any experimental or survey research. An appropriate estimation of sample size based on known information and statistical knowledge is of great significance. This article introduces methods of sample size estimation of difference test for data with the design of one factor with two levels, including sample size estimation formulas and realization based on the formulas and the POWER procedure of SAS software for quantitative data and qualitative data with the design of one factor with two levels. In addition, this article presents examples for analysis, which will play a leading role for researchers to implement the repetition principle during the research design phase.

8.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 738-42, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-448878

ABSTRACT

How to choose an appropriate design type to arrange research factors and their levels is an important issue in scientific research. Choosing an appropriate design type is directly related to the accuracy, scientificness and credibility of a research result. When facing a practical issue, how can researchers choose the most appropriate experimental design type to arrange an experiment based on the research objective and the practical situation? This article mainly introduces the related contents of the design of one factor with two levels and the design of one factor with k (k≥3) levels by analyzing some examples.

9.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 504-7, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-448799

ABSTRACT

The principles of balance, randomization, control and repetition, which are closely related, constitute the four principles of scientific research. The balance principle is the kernel of the four principles which runs through the other three. However, in scientific research, the balance principle is always overlooked. If the balance principle is not well performed, the research conclusion is easy to be denied, which may lead to the failure of the whole research. Therefore, it is essential to have a good command of the balance principle in scientific research. This article stresses the definition and function of the balance principle, the strategies and detailed measures to improve balance in scientific research, and the analysis of the common mistakes involving the use of the balance principle in scientific research.

10.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 615-8, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-415074

ABSTRACT

How to choose an appropriate experimental design type to arrange research factors and their levels is an important issue in experimental research. Choosing an appropriate design type is directly related to the accuracy and reliability of the research result. When confronting a practical issue, how can researchers choose the most appropriate design type to arrange the experiment based on research objective and specified situation? This article mainly introduces the related contents of the single-group design and the paired design through practical examples.

11.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 380-3, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-414852

ABSTRACT

Two-factor factorial design refers to the research involving two experimental factors and the number of the experimental groups equals to the product of the levels of the two experimental factors. In other words, it is the complete combination of the levels of the two experimental factors. The research subjects are randomly divided into the experimental groups. The two experimental factors are performed on the subjects at the same time, meaning that there is no order. The two experimental factors are equal during statistical analysis, that is to say, there is no primary or secondary distinction, nor nested relation. This article introduces estimation of sample size and testing power of quantitative data with two-factor factorial design.

12.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 966-9, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-430979

ABSTRACT

Two-factor designs are very commonly used in scientific research. If the two factors have interactions, research designs like the factorial design and the orthogonal design can be adopted; however, these designs usually require many experiments. If the two factors have no interaction or the interaction is not statistically significant on result in theory and in specialty, and the measuring error of experimental data under a certain condition (usually one of the experimental conditions that are formed by the complete combination of the levels of the two factors) is allowed in specialty, researchers can use random block design without repeated experiments, balanced incomplete random block design without repeated experiments, single factor design with a repeatedly measured factor, two-factor design without repeated experiments and two-factor nested design. This article introduces the last two design types by examples.

13.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 853-7, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-430966

ABSTRACT

Two-factor designs are quite commonly used in scientific research. If the two factors have interactions, research designs like the factorial design and the orthogonal design can be adopted; however, these designs usually require many experiments. If the two factors have no interaction or the interaction is not statistically significant on result in theory and in specialty, and the measuring error of the experimental data under a certain condition (usually it is one of the experimental conditions which is formed by the complete combination of the levels of two factors) is allowed in specialty, researchers can use random block design without repeated experiments, balanced non-complete random block design without repeated experiments, single factor design with a repeatedly measured factor, two-factor design without repeated experiments and two-factor nested design. This article introduced the first three design types with examples.

14.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 592-5, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-382560

ABSTRACT

Scientific research design includes specialty design and statistics design which can be subdivided into experimental design, clinical trial design and survey design. Usually, statistics textbooks introduce the core aspects of experimental design as the three key elements, the four principles and the design types, which run through the whole scientific research design and determine the overall success of the research. This article discusses the principle of randomization, which is one of the four principles, and focuses on the following two issues--the definition and function of randomization and the real life examples which go against the randomization principle, thereby demonstrating that strict adherence to the randomization principle leads to meaningful and valuable scientific research.

15.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 361-4, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-382528

ABSTRACT

Research factors are a very important element in any research design. Research factors include experimental and non-experimental factors. The former is the general term used to describe the similar experimental conditions that researchers are interested in, while the latter are other factors that researchers have little interest in but may influence the result. This article mainly focuses on the following issues: the definition of research factors, the selection and arrangement of experimental factors and non-experimental factors, the interaction between research factors, the standardization of research factors and the common mistakes frequently made by researchers.

16.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 1185-9, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-449065

ABSTRACT

This article introduces definitions of three special tests, namely, non-inferiority test (to verify that the efficacy of the experimental drug is clinically not inferior to that of the positive control drug), equivalence test (to verify that the efficacy of the experimental drug is equivalent to that of the control drug) and superiority test (to verify that the efficacy of the experimental drug is superior to that of the control drug), and methods of sample size estimation under the three different conditions. By specific examples, the article introduces formulas of sample size estimation for the three special tests, and their SAS realization in detail.

17.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 1070-4, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-449053

ABSTRACT

This article introduces the general concepts and methods of sample size estimation and testing power analysis. It focuses on parametric methods of sample size estimation, including sample size estimation of estimating the population mean and the population probability. It also provides estimation formulas and introduces how to realize sample size estimation manually and by SAS software.

18.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 242-5, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-449036

ABSTRACT

The research subject is the first key element of the three key elements in the research design. An appropriate selection of research subjects is crucial to the success of the research. This article summarizes the general principles for the selection of research subjects, the types and numbers of research subjects and the common mistakes that researchers tend to make in the selection of the research subjects. This article also provides the methodology suggestions for the selection of research subjects.

19.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 138-42, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-449024

ABSTRACT

The general problems existing in the clinical trials of investigational new drugs involve some key aspects such as the guiding principles, research designs, quality controls and statistical analyses. This paper explores the eight general issues in the clinical trials of investigational new drugs and presents precautionary measures with high operability. Research on the clinical trials of investigational new drugs is a complex project, which should be carried out strictly according to the policies, laws, criteria and operating rules set by related agencies. The neglect of research designs and data analyses will lead clinical trials to failure.

20.
Journal of Integrative Medicine ; (12): 1307-11, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-448866

ABSTRACT

This article introduces the definition and sample size estimation of three special tests (namely, non-inferiority test, equivalence test and superiority test) for qualitative data with the design of one factor with two levels having a binary response variable. Non-inferiority test refers to the research design of which the objective is to verify that the efficacy of the experimental drug is not clinically inferior to that of the positive control drug. Equivalence test refers to the research design of which the objective is to verify that the experimental drug and the control drug have clinically equivalent efficacy. Superiority test refers to the research design of which the objective is to verify that the efficacy of the experimental drug is clinically superior to that of the control drug. By specific examples, this article introduces formulas of sample size estimation for the three special tests, and their SAS realization in detail.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL